Subscribe
THE DAILY DIGEST

The daily edition.

Essential reading from Rocket Enterprise. Straight to the source.

Archived edition
DAILY EDITION1 story· 3 min read

SEP sizing: capacity, stateful clients, and restart persistence

SEP counts control how much request work can proceed concurrently. Stateful clients change that capacity model, while live sizing changes disappear at restart. Rocket Docs 12.0 explains the boundaries administrators need to account for.

IN FOCUS

SEP Sizing and Concurrency

When an enterprise server region is created, it contains two service execution processes (SEPs) that process incoming client requests. The number of SEPs in an enterprise server region impacts performance, and the optimal number depends on various variables, requiring experimentation to determine the best configuration for a particular enterprise server. [1]

Read the full briefing

Introduction to SEPs

When an enterprise server region is created, it contains two service execution processes (SEPs) that process incoming client requests. The number of SEPs in an enterprise server region impacts performance, and the optimal number depends on various variables, requiring experimentation to determine the best configuration for a particular enterprise server. Changing the number of SEPs in an enterprise server while it is running only has an effect until the server is stopped, at which point the number of SEPs reverts to the initially set value. [1]

Long-running Requests and SEP Concurrency

Long-running requests, such as those involving stateful services or transactions, maintain a connection between the client and server until the transaction ends or the client indicates that stateful processing is no longer required. In such cases, the service execution process is dedicated to the specific client and cannot process requests from other clients. To maintain responsiveness, the enterprise server starts a new service execution process for each stateful request, which can lead to dynamic growth of service execution processes and consume machine resources, potentially affecting performance. One boundary matters: if stateful processing was already active, or the first service request in a transaction was stateful, ending that transaction does not end the long-running request. The server remains in stateful mode. [2] [3]

Configuring SEPs for Stateful Requests

For applications that require stateful interaction, it is recommended to have more service execution processes available, even if the service is CPU-bound rather than I/O-bound. The enterprise server region automatically starts a new service execution process when it detects a stateful request. However, it is advised to keep stateful requests to a minimum unless the application design specifically requires them, as dynamic growth of service execution processes can impact performance. [3]

Persistence and Scope of SEP Configuration

A live change to the number of SEPs lasts only until the server stops. On restart, the count returns to the value saved when the server was added or its details were edited. Treat runtime capacity changes as temporary; retain the intended count in the saved server configuration for subsequent starts. [1]

Practical Implications and Recommendations

The optimal number of SEPs should be determined through experimentation, taking into account the specific needs of the enterprise server and its applications. It is also important to monitor the performance of the enterprise server and adjust the SEP configuration as needed to ensure optimal performance. Additionally, keeping stateful requests to a minimum can help avoid unnecessary dynamic growth of service execution processes and potential performance impacts. [1] [3]

Enterprise Server · 12.0 · Linux/UNIX
Documentation references
That’s the briefing.You’ve reached the end of this edition.
More editions

From the archive

View all
Oct 24

Inside a SEP: from queued request to COBOL execution

Oct 23

The enterprise stack, in focus.

Oct 22

JCL execution and output are controlled by two separate class-matching gates